Association master policy
Generally addresses common elements, building property within its defined responsibility, and association liability. Its scope, limits, exclusions, and deductible affect every unit owner.
How an HO-6 works with the association’s master policy—and how to protect the unit interior, belongings, liability, living arrangements, and assessment exposure without leaving a gap between policies.
A condo owner does not insure the entire building like a single-family homeowner. The association’s master policy protects association-level property and liability interests; the owner’s HO-6 protects the owner’s unit-level property and personal exposures.
Generally addresses common elements, building property within its defined responsibility, and association liability. Its scope, limits, exclusions, and deductible affect every unit owner.
Can cover building items assigned to the owner, personal property, loss of use, personal liability, medical payments to others, and eligible loss assessments.
Where does the association’s insured responsibility end and the owner’s begin? The answer comes from the declaration, bylaws or other dedicatory instruments, the master policy, and the HO-6—not from the words “condo” or “walls-in” alone.
The coverage letters are policy-section labels. The amount needed under each section depends on what the owner is responsible for and what the master policy leaves uninsured.
Interior building items and improvements that are the unit owner’s insurance responsibility, subject to the HO-6 form and master-policy boundary.
Furniture, clothing, electronics, and other covered belongings, including eligible property away from the residence.
Additional living expense and other covered benefits when a covered loss makes the unit unfit to live in.
Defense and covered damages when an insured is legally liable for bodily injury or property damage to others.
Limited no-fault medical payments for eligible injuries to other people, subject to policy terms.
The owner’s covered share of certain association assessments, up to the applicable limit and any separate deductible-related sublimit.
These terms are useful shorthand, but they are not perfectly standardized. The association documents and actual policy wording control. Agents should never set Coverage A from the label alone.
| Common description | Master policy may include | HO-6 responsibility commonly includes |
|---|---|---|
| Bare walls / studs-out | Building shell, structural elements, and common areas, with limited or no coverage for unit interiors. | Broad interior responsibility that can include drywall, flooring, cabinets, built-ins, fixtures, and owner improvements, plus personal property and personal liability. |
| Single entity / original specifications | Building and original interior fixtures or finishes as initially constructed. | Owner upgrades and alterations beyond original specifications, plus personal property, liability, loss of use, and assessment exposure. |
| All-in / all-inclusive | Building, unit interior items, and potentially improvements, depending on the wording. | At minimum, personal property, personal liability, loss of use, and loss assessment. Coverage A may still be needed for items, upgrades, deductibles, or causes the master policy does not cover. |
Texas Property Code §82.111 requires a condominium association, to the extent coverage is reasonably available, to maintain property insurance on insurable common elements and commercial general liability insurance. For a building with units having horizontal boundaries described in the declaration, the association’s property insurance must include the units but need not include improvements and betterments installed by unit owners.
The statute also permits additional insurance requirements in the declaration and does not prevent a unit owner or mortgage holder from requiring or obtaining additional coverage. That is why the Texas statute, association documents, master policy, lender requirements, and HO-6 must be read together.
Under a broadly bare-walls arrangement, the owner may indeed need to insure nearly everything inside the unfinished unit boundary. But the actual definition of the unit—and the association’s repair and insurance obligations—can differ. Confirm before quoting.
Upgrades installed by a unit owner may fall outside the master policy even when the association describes its coverage as “all-in.” Hardwood replacing basic carpet, upgraded cabinets, custom built-ins, premium countertops, relocated walls, and renovated bathrooms can materially increase the owner’s building-property exposure.
Identify the finishes and fixtures originally delivered with the unit.
Include prior owners’ improvements when they transfer with the unit—not only work completed by the current owner.
Estimate labor and material costs to rebuild covered interior property after a loss, including demolition and access costs where applicable.
Confirm whether replacement-cost conditions, special deductibles, ordinance or law, and water limitations affect the recommendation.
Loss assessment coverage can pay the unit owner’s share of certain assessments levied against unit owners because of covered property damage to association property or a covered association liability claim. Coverage applies only up to the HO-6 limit and subject to the cause-of-loss, timing, policy-period, and assessment provisions in the form.
A covered fire or storm causes damage that exceeds available association insurance, and the covered shortfall is assessed to owners.
A covered liability judgment exceeds the association’s available liability insurance and an eligible share is assessed to owners.
A large property deductible is allocated to owners. Coverage may apply, but many forms impose special conditions or a smaller deductible-assessment sublimit.
| Assessment reason | Typical HO-6 response | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Covered property or liability loss | Potentially covered | The assessment must arise from a cause and type of loss the loss-assessment provision covers. |
| Association master-policy deductible | Potentially covered, often limited | The form may cap deductible assessments separately or require that the underlying loss be covered. |
| Routine maintenance or capital project | Not covered | Planned upkeep, roof replacement from age, and ordinary repairs are not accidental covered losses. |
| Reserve shortfall or operating deficit | Not covered | Loss assessment is not a guarantee of the association’s finances. |
| Flood, wear and tear, or another excluded cause | Generally not covered | An assessment does not convert an excluded cause into a covered one. |
Texas Property Code §82.111 provides that the association’s dedicatory instruments determine payment of the master-policy deductible and pre-insurance costs when a covered repair exceeds the deductible. If those documents are silent, the board may allocate the costs by recorded resolution; otherwise they are a common expense. If damage is caused wholly or partly by a unit owner or that owner’s guest or invitee, the association may assess the deductible and uninsured excess against that owner and unit.
Obtain the association’s property deductibles—including percentage, named-storm, wind, hail, and water deductibles—and compare the owner’s possible allocation with both the total loss-assessment limit and any deductible-assessment sublimit.
When water escapes from one unit into another, the claim may involve the affected owner’s HO-6, the originating owner’s liability coverage, the association’s master policy, or more than one policy. Responsibility and coverage turn on the source and timing of the water, whether the event was sudden or gradual, who had a duty to maintain or repair the failed item, whether anyone was negligent, the unit boundary, and each policy’s exclusions and deductibles.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Where did the water originate? | Identifies the failed system or source and the parties whose policies may be involved. |
| Was the release sudden or repeated? | Sudden accidental discharge may be treated differently from seepage, deterioration, maintenance, or mold. |
| Who owned or maintained the failed component? | The declaration may assign pipes, appliances, common systems, or limited common elements differently. |
| Was anyone legally negligent? | Liability coverage depends on legal responsibility, not merely on which unit the water came from. |
| What property was damaged? | Master building property, owner building property, personal belongings, and additional living expense can fall under different coverage sections. |
A supply line in an upstairs unit breaks and damages the ceiling, flooring, and furniture below. The downstairs owner may first claim under their own HO-6 for covered property. The master policy may address insured building property. If the upstairs owner was negligent, liability and subrogation questions may follow—but origin alone does not prove negligence.
Coverage gaps usually begin with an assumption about what the association insures. Ask for current documents; do not rely solely on a sales listing, property manager’s summary, or last year’s certificate.
How does the declaration define the unit, common elements, and limited common elements?
What building property does the master policy insure inside the unit, and on what valuation basis?
Which original finishes and later improvements must the owner insure?
What are the master-policy deductibles, and how may they be allocated to this owner?
Does the HO-6 loss-assessment provision cover master deductibles, and is there a separate sublimit?
Are wind, hail, named storm, flood, sewer backup, seepage, or mold restricted by either policy?
Are Coverage A, personal-property, loss-of-use, and liability limits adequate for the owner’s actual exposure?
Does the mortgage lender require specific building-property coverage, deductibles, endorsements, or evidence?